the english compo i did in _______ mins.

Should both parents leave their toddlers to the care of someone else while they go out to bring home the bread? This has a topic debated numerous times. Some parents might say, "Hey, why not?". These parents might think that this would benefit the child, such that by having a bigger income, their children would be able to lead a sheltered lifestyle and that they would grow up to be more independent. However, is this really the case?

We are living in the 21st century, a time and place where the media influences a big part of our lives. Television, radio, even the arts have been a source of entertainment, but they can also be an input of bad influence. The watering down of moral values through the music and television has posed a big problem to our society.

With such big problems that are troubling today's teens, parents must than ask themselves, is leaving their kids at home in the care of a guardian wise? Firstly, I would like to point out that no one can ever replace a parents position in a child's heart. This can be seen from the phrases, "Daddy's girl" and " Mummy's boy". Parents are the role models of children and by placing them in the care of another such as grandparents, foreign helpers or even Montessori's would take away this bond that the two share. Also, parents tend to be more meticulous in bringing up their own flesh and blood, ensuring that their every want and need is fulfilled.


and the rest is history;


I AM SUCH A PROCRASTINATOR.
every time the "back to school" hour comes around, I find homework I never knew I had popping out miraculously from no where. I still have my STUPID ART PROJECT TO DO. (oh god help me) AND, not to mention my english compo that's half done, my hist worksheet that hasn't been touched, my chem quiz that REFUSES TO BE SUBMITTED and a whole lot of math questions that cannot be solved.

DEBORAH QUEK, GO AND DIE LA HUH. make the world a better place.

if i wrote you a symphony;
deborah


Comments